it wasn't a suggestion to add them to comments - just looking for clarification based on your Beethoven example.
are dedicated catalogue number fields on any roadmap, do we know? cheers p -----Original Message----- From: musicbrainz-style-boun...@lists.musicbrainz.org [mailto:musicbrainz-style-boun...@lists.musicbrainz.org] On Behalf Of symphonick Sent: 18 May 2011 12:03 To: MusicBrainz Style Discussion Subject: Re: [mb-style] CSG: Work aliases On Wed, 18 May 2011 12:51:00 +0200, Pete Marsh <pete.ma...@bbc.co.uk> wrote: > looks sensible to me, though I'm imagining that Urtexts for some > composers/works might be hard to find. > > and with Mozart for instance...would Köchel numbers go into the > comment field for diambiguation too (as they're not Mozart's) but be > allowed in aliases? In an ideal world we will have fields to add all catalogue numbers. (I think you're the first to suggest using the comment field). I suppose we will continue like before & add opus/our choosen catalogue (Köchel for Mozart) to the titles. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style http://www.bbc.co.uk/ This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, please delete it from your system. Do not use, copy or disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it and notify the sender immediately. Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
