On 10/28/2011 06:03 AM, Frederic Da Vitoria wrote: > 2011/10/28, Jim DeLaHunt<from.nab...@jdlh.com>: >> Hi, everyone: >> >> I would appreciate review and comments on RFC-339: Partial Works >> Relationship Inheritance. The full proposal is at >> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Partial_Works_Relationship_Inheritance >> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Proposal:Partial_Works_Relationship_Inheritance >> . Comments welcome at that Wiki page, or on its Talk page, or here in this >> thread. >> > What about cadenzas? How would we handle them. Note that AFAIK we > don't handle them very well currently :-) >
The Work Group thread [1] talked about a mechanism for over-riding global "parent" ARs with local "child" ARs.[2] Jim, would your proposal work the same way? Or would you simply not set a "parent" ARs unless it is true for all "children"? [1] http://musicbrainz.1054305.n4.nabble.com/RFC-Concept-of-works-group-tp3535348p3535348.html [2] would that mean we'd need a "null value" available to over-ride an AR that doesn't apply to a "child"? Alex / caller#6 _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
