On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 01:31:23AM +0100, Johannes Weißl wrote: > The only problem I have with the proposal is that with the missing > support in MusicBrainz, the creation of lots of standalone recordings > will make the situation worse (more confusing) than it currently already > is, before it can make it better. But in principle I have nothing > against this AR, so I'm giving it +1, with a request for another week > RFC period (from now).
However, I also think this AR should be integrated into the Parts Relationship Type [1]. So my +1 counts for a combined Recording/Work "part of" AR. [1] http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/Parts_Relationship_Type Johannes _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
