On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 22:58, lorenz pressler <l...@gmx.at> wrote: > Am 02.04.2012, 22:36 Uhr, schrieb Philip Jägenstedt <phi...@foolip.org>: > >> http://musicbrainz.org/edit/16971109 reminded me of this issue, which >> I haven't understood since the introduction of NGS. >> >> One the one hand, disambiguation comments aren't used for tagging >> (right?) so moving information there would produce some broken tags >> for people who use normalized tagging in Picard. On the other hand, >> disambiguation comments are shown in parenthesis after the titles >> everywhere on the website, which really invites moving some things in >> (parenthesis) to the disambiguation comments to make things look nice >> and tidy. > > afair: > recording -> disamig. comment only > tracklist -> if its on the tracklist then it should be included in the > trackname
Is this documented anywhere, and is it how everyone is actually editing? Is no one using the recording-level data for tagging, or are you including disambiguation comments in all files to, well, disambiguate? -- Philip Jägenstedt _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
