On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:40 PM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren <reosare...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 8:57 PM, Philip Jägenstedt <phi...@foolip.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Nicolás Tamargo de Eguren >> <reosare...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Calvin Walton <calvin.wal...@kepstin.ca> >>> wrote: >>>> On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 21:52 +0200, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: >>>>> http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/User:Foolip/Performance_Relationship_Type >>>>> >>>>> I used the definition from the previous thread. The link phrases would >>>>> just have "medley" added, e.g. "live cover medley recording of". >>>> >>>> I like the idea, but on a technical note: >>>> >>>> Do you have any plans for how the data will be migrated from the old AR >>>> to the new one? There's a couple of options here, maybe: >>>> >>>> A. Have a developer write a script to do all the conversions >>>> automatically, server-side after the AR is created. >>>> B. Have a developer write a report showing things using the 'old' >>>> medley AR; it will only be deleted once the report is empty. >>>> >>>> Either one would be fine, but you'll have to find a developer to sponsor >>>> your request :) >>> >>> We have around 2500, so that's a pain, but I'd go with C) convince a >>> bot owner to run a bot for this for a couple days. >> >> My thinking was to deprecate the existing AR so that new ones can't be >> added, like the "earliest release" AR. Is that easy enough to do? Then >> the ARs can be converted slowly with the help of reports and/or bots. > > That's trivial, yeah.
Great, is there anything else (other than a +1) I need before RFV, i.e. do I need to update the existing medley AR to say it's deprecated? -- Philip Jägenstedt _______________________________________________ MusicBrainz-style mailing list MusicBrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
