Jeremy, et al -- ...and then Jeremy Blosser said... % % On Apr 11, David T-G [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: % > % > Aha! I didn't realize that tagging would go beyond limits. It's manual, % > but it will work. % % Tagging won't necessarily go beyond limits, it's <*-thread> commands that
Ahhhh... I get it. % go beyond limits. Because of this "feature" you could just limit to % messages with your message ids in the references header and then That's a possibility. And since I mark anything I want to keep with an X-Label: that will make excluding those from a deletion easy... Hey, I just might get this thing cleaned out :-) Hey, does anyone have a diffmail so I can see what changes in my test mailbox? :-) % delete-thread on those messages. % % I don't like that this works, but in your case it appears to be useful. Yeah, same here on both counts. It's somehow wrong, but I'll use it to my advantage :-) :-D -- David T-G * It's easier to fight for one's principles (play) [EMAIL PROTECTED] * than to live up to them. -- fortune cookie (work) [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.justpickone.org/davidtg/ Shpx gur Pbzzhavpngvbaf Qrprapl Npg!
msg27084/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature