On 10/30/07, Joe Abley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 30-Oct-2007, at 12:55, Andy Davidson wrote: > > > I would support the creation of a mail-operators list (& agenda time > > for a mailops bof, since a lot of networks are small enough to mean > > that netops and sysops are often the same guys) if it's deemed to be > > offtopic on nanog-l. > > Mail seems to be one of those topics which is of interest to many > nanog subscribers, but simultaneously annoying to many (presumably > different) nanog subscribers. > > Given that observation, creating a [EMAIL PROTECTED] list for the > discussion of "e-mail operations" as a bounded experiment seems like a > reasonable thing to do.
We've already talked about this. It was left at "possible". I don't agree that operational issues related to the Internet needs to be segregated from the main list, just the politics and kookery. I'm not in favor of mailops@ since opening up such a topic as a free for all is a recipe for disaster. Spam-l is well established and accepts operators. Go west young man. Otherwise, use your kill file, Luke. Martin Hannigan NANOG MLC Memeber
