Almost? I'd say it's hands down an EXCELLENT reason. In some configs though, the NAT'd people can still see each other and cause problems, but it still cuts down the exposure. ---- Presumably, the people it would cause problems for would be the customers of someone getting paid to care about them. :) Deepak Jain AiNET
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Avleen Vig
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Daniska Tomas
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? kevin graham
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? mike harrison
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Deepak Jain
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? kevin graham
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? John Kristoff
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Daniska Tomas
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Valdis . Kletnieks
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Daniska Tomas
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Mansey, Jon
- Re[2]: Large ISPs doing NAT? Richard Welty