On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Vinny Abello wrote:
> > OK. People can stop correcting me now. :) I did catch the mistake > immediately after I sent the email. Now something REALLY useful in an email > client would be an unsend feature... I'm joking of course. I have to say > that before I get slammed with the technical reasons why that wouldn't work > for mail on the Internet which I'm already well aware. ;) I guess that if mail sent to the nanog list wouldnt take 5-60 minutes to get delivered to all people on the list, people would sooner see that someone else has actually answered the email in question, and wont answer themselves. I remember this being discussed earlier, is there any perticular reason why this hasnt been fixed? If nanog-l is supposed to be a list for operational purposes, doesnt that require speedy delivery in a lot of cases? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]