Bell COs do not have Cameras, at least not those in Verizon, Bell South, or SBC land that we have seen.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Gerald" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 5:30 PM Subject: RE: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) > > These places do not have cameras and evidence that point to malicious > intent to destroy your network? > > I'm sorry but that would make me just about irate, and definitely insist > on moving the equipment ASAP. I don't plan on paying for colo facilities > that I have any doubt in the integrity of the people with access to the > facility. > > (Similar Disclaimer: I've never met a union worker that wanted to do more > for the customer, than for themselves. Their blatant apathy can be a > detriment to real work in times of emergencies.) > > G > > On Wed, 21 Aug 2002, Deepak Jain wrote: > > > > > > > We have seen disgruntled Union members hit the EPO in data centers in > > Union-friendly cities. > > > > Not pretty outcome, no matter how much redundancy you have. > > > > Fire code is not compatible with Union rules. > > > > DJ > > > > (Disclaimer, I have a completely unbalanced view of Union workers, all bad. > > I know > > there are good Union workers, but I have never met any professionally -- I > > have met > > plenty AFTER retirement though). > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > > > Vincent J. Bono > > > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 2:50 PM > > > To: N. Richard Solis; Sean Donelan; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: Re: Eliminating physical colocation (was Re: Shared facilities) > > > > > > > > > > > > We have always had more of an issue with "Union Members" rather than > > > "Verizon Employees" per se. If you don't use Union Labor to install in > > > Boston or New York you had best have a secured cabinet or else 25 pair > > > bundles seem to spontaneously develop slices. > > > >