Thanks to all who have responding with information from their network 
vantage point.  It does indeed seem to be an IGP or blackholing issue 
inside of Sprint. In the interim I made an advertising change to hopefully 
minimize the impact until I hear from someone at Sprint as to what the 
issue is.

         ---Mike


At 01:35 PM 26/09/2002 -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:

>At 01:31 PM 26/09/2002 -0400, Vinny Abello wrote:
>>Looks like something isn't right... I see the announcement from Sprint 
>>with an AS path of 1239 852 11647, but it never gets past one of the 
>>routers on Sprint's network. I have no problem going through Cable and 
>>Wireless:
>
>Yes, and the strange thing is that is just one IP address :-( 
>199.212.134.9... If you try 199.212.134.1 I bet you can get to it via sprint.
>
>
>>Type escape sequence to abort.
>>Tracing the route to smtp2.sentex.ca (199.212.134.9)
>>
>>   1 63-121-101-106.focaldata.net (63.121.101.106) [AS 18984] 0 msec 0 
>> msec 0 msec
>>   2 acr2-so-3-3-0.newyork.cw.net (206.24.193.153) [AS 3561] 0 msec 4 
>> msec 0 msec
>>   3 agr4-loopback.newyork.cw.net (206.24.194.104) [AS 3561] 4 msec 0 msec
>>     agr3-loopback.newyork.cw.net (206.24.194.103) [AS 3561] 4 msec
>>   4 dcr1-so-7-2-0.newyork.cw.net (206.24.207.73) [AS 3561] 4 msec
>>     dcr1-so-6-2-0.newyork.cw.net (206.24.207.57) [AS 3561] 0 msec
>>     dcr1-so-7-3-0.newyork.cw.net (206.24.207.77) [AS 3561] 4 msec
>>   5 telus-services-inc.newyork.cw.net (206.24.207.90) [AS 3561] 24 msec 
>> 24 msec 20 msec
>>   6 toroonnlbr00.bb.telus.com (154.11.11.130) [AS 852] 20 msec 24 msec 
>> 20 msec
>>   7 toroonzddr00.bb.telus.com (154.11.6.67) [AS 852] 24 msec 24 msec 20 msec
>>   8 peer.toroonzddr00.bb.telus.com (209.115.141.5) [AS 852] 28 msec 28 
>> msec 32 msec
>>   9 iolite.sentex.ca (209.112.4.3) [AS 15290] 24 msec 24 msec 24 msec
>>  10 smtp2.sentex.ca (199.212.134.9) [AS 11647] 28 msec 24 msec 32 msec
>>
>>I would contact Sprint. Good luck!
>
>Thanks, I did.  Responder robot said they would try to get back to me in 
>72hrs :-(
>
>         ---Mike
>

Reply via email to