On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Niels Bakker wrote:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christopher L. Morrow) [Sat 19 Jul 2003, 01:03 CEST]: > > hrm, what nodes don't run 55/53/77/103? What do? Do you have a list? Could > > we have it? > > I'm sure you know what devices in your network run Mobile IP or Sun ND > (to paraphrase Randy Bush, you can probably count them on the fingers > of your nose). my nose has many fingers... wait, thats hairs! :) though I do agree... So, I must apologize for reading your message's intent in reverse. > > Router#conf t > Router(config)#ip receive-acl 10 no-idiocy > > > > Seriously though... the edge networks (as Jared pointed out) should be > > able to decide what they want to filter and what they don't... perhaps > > some large ISP would decide you don't want any traffic from 212/8 or > > perhaps all porn? Or all religious material? You don't want someone > > deciding what you do and don't get... unless that someone is you :) > > That's why I said that transit networks could filter only towards their > own infrastructure. > Agreed, and it does, to some extent... As should anyone elses, eh? It makes sense that if you have either of the 2 main vendor's products you can accomplish this task easily and at 'no cost' > > > yes... inside my network I know what my loopbacks and links are, inside > > yours?? No idea... or Jared's or Tim Battles or... > > Luckily it's not your responsibility to protect them (only to intervene > when advised they're under attack, which I've heard you're doing a very > good job at - but that aside). We thank you, its a group effort... but as I said above, my apologies, this current event has me a bit punchy :)