On Tue, Nov 04, 2003 at 07:10:27AM +0200, Hank Nussbacher wrote: > > On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Ray Wong wrote: > > > I'm starting to figure that, given the delays, there's been enough damage > > done that 204.89.224/24 will never be able to get off the blocking lists > > anyway, so perhaps I'll turn it back in afterall. *sigh*That's what > > I get for trying to find low-cost ISPs willing to announce portable > > space. > > So a RIR giving out that /24 would in fact be selling "damaged goods" and > the customer who got it would be able to sue. I think RIRs have to make a > larger effort to protect their assets.
But the RIRs are not selling any goods; are they not simply selling a directory service? -ron