Robert Bonomi wrote:
<snip>
In actuality, *I* am not QUITE as draconian as suggested a couple of
paragraphs previously. If I forward somebody's mail and get a complaint
from the reciveing system about spam to that user, "originating" from my
system, that user *permanently* loses any forwarding privileges/capabilities.
No appeal, no _notice_ no 'second chance', no nothing -- forwarding just
"stops working" for them. They _were_ told of this "down-side risk", with
regard to such an error, *before* the forwarding was enabled. They get to
live with the consequences.
I suspect that sooner or later you will be amending your proccess to
include a stated notice of understanding/whitelisting/no abuse
complaints from both this users and this users forwarded-to system's
administrators, before considering turninng on the forwarding hose.
