On May 6, 2008, at 12:59 AM, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > If not, what should the criteria be for an "official" note of the > paper?
Perhaps it's an oversimplification, but can't those who wish to publish such information simply deliver their papers at a NANOG meeting (after acceptance by the Program Committee, which acts as a gate), and then the NANOG folks post the documents along with any slides and the VoDs of their presentations, in the usual fashion? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Roland Dobbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // +66.83.266.6344 mobile History is a great teacher, but it also lies with impunity. -- John Robb _______________________________________________ NANOG mailing list NANOG@nanog.org http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog