On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:31 PM Scott Weeks <sur...@mauigateway.com> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 4:02 PM Jerry Cloe <je...@jtcloe.net> wrote: > > > There's already widespread use (abuse ?) of DOD /8's. > > T-Mobile commonly assigns 26/8 space (and others) to > > customers and nat's it. > > > --- cb.li...@gmail.com wrote: > From: Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com> > > My understanding is that is not currently commonly the > case > > > https://www.worldipv6launch.org/apps/ipv6week/measurement/images/graphs/T-MobileUSA.png > --------------------------------------------------- > > > Did they renumber (IPv4) out of that space? Or are they > just not continuing to expand into it? > > scott They stopped using ipv4 assigned for handsets for most cases with 464xlat https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/deploy360/2014/case-study-t-mobile-us-goes-ipv6-only-using-464xlat/ BT did similar https://www.ipv6.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Nick-Heatley_BT_EE_Update_UKv6Council_201801207.pdf And Telstra https://blog.apnic.net/2017/01/13/telstras-five-year-mobile-ipv6-plan-becomes-reality/ And SK https://blog.apnic.net/2019/06/03/ipv6-deployment-and-challenges-at-sk-telecom/ And Rogers, Telus, and others > >