ISP here. Deploying gigabit FTTH. No IPv6. Customers have 0 complaints about IPv6. 0 Complaints since 2006.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 4:32 PM Grant Taylor via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> wrote: > On 3/9/22 1:01 PM, Jay Hennigan wrote: > > It's not just equipment vendors, it's ISPs. > > I completely agree. > > I get why line of business applications; e.g. billing, provisioning, > repair, haven't been updated to support IPv6. > > But I believe that any network equipment vendor that is (or has been for > the last 1-2 decades) selling /new/ equipment really has no excuse for > not IPv6 not having feature parity with IPv4. > > > Here in Oregon, Frontier was recently acquired by Ziply. They're doing > > massive infrastructure work and recently started offering symmetrical > > gigabit FTTH. This is a brand new greenfield PON deployment. No > > IPv6. It took being transferred three times to reach a person who > > even knew what it was. > > I've had similar lack of success with my municipal GPON provider. At > least the people answering support tickets know what IPv6 is and know > that it's on their future list without even being in planing / testing > phase. > > > Likewise the Wave Broadband cable operator. No IPv6, no plans for it. > > .... > > > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > >