Hi Sense, Op zondag 07-02-2010 om 12:28 uur [tijdzone +0100], schreef Sense Hofstede: > A reasonable part of the bugs reported with Ubuntu's bug reporter > 'Apport' -- which is also used to fill OpenSuSE's crash database -- > are crashes. These kind of reports contain a Stacktrace, > ThreadStacktrace, the .xsession-errors file and some more > information[1]. Often those crashes are hard to reproduce, but the > stacktraces could still provide useful information. > > Since I triage mostly Nautilus bugs, on Launchpad, I would like to ask > you how you think about such reports. Is a mere stacktrace enough when > forwarding the bug upstream? Or do you want more information? I > wouldn't want to open dozens of unusable bugs on GNOME Bugzilla, but I > also wouldn't want to leave crash bugs go by unnoticed.
You will find information on what the Gnome bugsquad expects from you on http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad . In general, only stack traces containing debug symbols are really useful. Cc'ing the bugsquad list as that is a better place to ask such questions as these. regards, -- Reinout van Schouwen -- nautilus-list mailing list nautilus-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list