On 10/08/06, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That's actually why I never applied that patch, even though I looked > at it a few times. It was adding a linker flag to the compile time > routines that is unknown as to where it is supported. I failed to see > how that was at all portable.
Well, now we'll find out whether it is or not :-) That's only half tongue in cheek - this patch was clearly not appropriate for the patches branches, but it seemed reasonable to try it on the main development code. If it proves more trouble than it's worth, then we can back it out and reject the patch. But it doesn't seem sensible to leave patches hanging in limbo for years, because we're too cautious to try them out. (And yes, I do recognise the irony in the juxtaposition of my last two postings!) Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Net-snmp-coders mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
