"Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" <jason.ste...@nokia.com> wrote: > Thanks Alex. Sorry about those sloppy mistakes. I agree about the > ../a-list and I should have said count > 0. > > In the 2nd part of my email, my intention was to only allow foo to be > configured if a-list has at least one entry configured. So I don't > think min-elements 1 would work. I don't want to always require an > entry in a-list. I only want to require one if foo is configured. > > I guess this also achieves the same thing right ? > must "../a-list[entry=*]";
Yes, if all a-list entries has a node called "entry". But if that't what you want, do: must "../a-list[entry]"; > If foo has a default value, then does that mean the "must" is > evaluated even if foo is deleted from the config ? > leaf foo { > must "../a-list"; <- always evaluated because of default ? > type uint16; > default 5; > } > If the must is always evaluated then it would be the equivalent of > having min-elements 1 in a-list. Correct. /martin > > Rgds, > Jason > > From: Alex Campbell [mailto:alex.campb...@aviatnet.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 9:57 PM > To: Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) <jason.ste...@nokia.com>; > net...@ietf..org > Subject: Re: YANG 'must' Xpaths, predicates and wildcards > > > Hi, > > > > For one thing, it should be ../a-list since a-list is not a child of > foo. > > Also - if foo is not configured and has no default value, then any > must expressions in foo are not evaluated because it is not part of > the "accessible tree". (I tested this in ConfD) > > Apart from these issues, yes it will behave as you expect - it will > fail if a-list contains no entries. > > > > must "count(a-list) > 1"; is not equivalent since it requires at least > two entries. > > > > However, you can more simply add a min-elements 1; statement to a-list > to achieve the same goal - no XPath required. > > > > ________________________________ > From: netmod <netmod-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org>> > on behalf of Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) > <jason.ste...@nokia.com<mailto:jason.ste...@nokia.com>> > Sent: Wednesday, 28 March 2018 1:10 p.m. > To: netmod@ietf.org<mailto:netmod@ietf.org> > Subject: [netmod] YANG 'must' Xpaths, predicates and wildcards > > Hi all, > > I'm pretty sure that this xpath (e.g. in a must statement) isn't > correct: > > (A) ../container-a/list-b[name=*]/some-leaf > > and should just be this instead: > > (B) ../container-a/list-b/some-leaf > > Or is the * an allowable wildcard for a key value in a predicate ? > > I also had a question about whether the following "must" correctly > checks that at least one entry exists in a-list. > > container c1 { > leaf foo { > must "a-list"; > type uint16; > } > list a-list { > key "entry"; > leaf entry { > type uint16; > } > leaf another-entry { > type uint32; > } > } > } > > I think I could also replace that must with the following: > must "count(a-list) > 1"; > but does must "a-list"; achieve the same thing ? > > Rgds, > Jason _______________________________________________ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod