I just told a Unix guy I know I was going to try and use Mandrake for doing
some Web serving. He told me that he doesn't know that much about Linux,
but that he'd heard Red Hat was the way to go for serving, because their
socket layers were better.
I imagine this is a debatable claim, but that's neither here nor there. I'm
writing, because my understanding is that mandrake is just Red Hat with a
better install program and some other stuff, but that the underlying code
is identical. My friend's comment, though, made me want to question this.
So is the only difference between REd Hat and Mandrake 'packaging', or am I
wrong?
Thanks,
Chris
