On Tuesday 17 September 2002 09:26, Miark wrote: > Marco, > > > Anyone who doesn't agree 100% with what George W. Bush says > > or does, is automatically considered a terrorist or terrorist > > sympathiser, and can be detained indefinitely without a shred > > of evidence, legal representation or even visitation rights > > for his next of kin. > > Have Newbie Americans been attacking Australia on this list? New > Zealand? The UK? France? Canada? No. But let me tell you a secret: > it's not because those countries are superior, or without fault.
Feel free to attack switzerland, I will be the first one to agree with you. > You, on the other hand, just criticized the US. Worse, you are wrong, > and clueless as to what goes on here. (And watching Aussie news > doesn't count.) Do you think your comment was appropriate? Helpful? > Edifying? Respectful? > > No, it was insulting, from the first sentence to the last. He just points out that the Bush policy doesn't give way to something like: you are both wrong. It is absolute and the choice between bad and completely unacceptable isn't something I want to be forced to make. And secondly as far a I know there is not a shred of evidence that the Taliban were responsible for the 11.Sept. (don't missunderstand me: it was right to fight them, their government violated just about every human right, but maybe they didn't do IT...) > > Don't Americans know the laws that govern their very lives? > > Maybe in this case, ignorance is bliss. > > Ignorance, indeed. > > I don't trash your country, so don't insult me with your media's > fictions of mine. > > Miark Patrik
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
