On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 09:35, JoeHill wrote: > On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 08:52:26 -0400 > Lanman disseminated the following: > > > You can argue with Lyvim's point of view, but only if you like being > > wrong. > > So, are you taking over Lyvim's arrogant side now? <G> > > I don't think anyone is arguing with his point of view anyhow, *he's* arguing > against a point *that no one made*, at least in this thread.
It's called an observation. By definition that cannot be called an argument; and as I already pointed out my response should have been taken as adjunct and not comparative. LX
____________________________________________________ Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com Join the Club : http://www.mandrakeclub.com ____________________________________________________
