Hey Axelon Bloodstone..
Go get fucked.
I mean reallllllllly.< gasp>
DAVID CLARK
A+ MCP
Lafayette LA USA
::::-----Original Message-----
::::From: Axalon Bloodstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
::::Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 7:51 PM
::::To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::::Subject: RE: [newbie] New Millenium
::::
::::
::::
::::Circle gets a square... to paraphrase what ever that game show is.
::::
::::and to para-phrase the lady on cnn..
::::
::::Isn't it amazing what the international community can acomplish when it
::::pulls it's head out of it's a$$.
::::
::::
::::I mean really.
::::It shocks me that we can acomplish this and people are still starveing ,
::::and bathing in the same water they (well you know) in..
::::
::::On Sat, 1 Jan 2000, Jeffrey A. Crum wrote:
::::> Hmmmm. Don't ya think that the hype about Y2K brought to
::::light what people
::::> and companies had to do to make the fixes so there wouldn't
::::be any problems?
::::> I am in the computer field and know for a fact that if we
::::hadn't made the
::::> changes, our systems would NOT have worked. We are working
::::with 10-20 year
::::> old code and they didn't even imagine that the programs would
::::still be in
::::> use come 2000.
::::>
::::> > -----Original Message-----
::::> > From: Etien T. VanDenBroecke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
::::> > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 12:20 PM
::::> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
::::> > Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium
::::> >
::::> >
::::> > Yes that is true, but it has been said that somewhere along the
::::> > lines we all
::::> > lost a year, so is it the year 2000 or the year 2001?? who
::::> > knows, all that I
::::> > know is that the media hype about the Y2K bug, looks like it turn
::::> > out to be a
::::> > big money making scam.......
::::> >
::::> > Anybody else agree? Example: three days ago a friend of mine
::::> > heard on the radio
::::> > that some fool went and purchased and re-wired his whole
::::house, to on run
::::> > generators for the Y2K blitz!!
::::> >
::::> > HAPPY NEW YEAR ALL!
::::> > Etien
::::> >
::::> >
::::> > On Sat, 01 Jan 2000, Daniel wrote:
::::> > > There is no argument the new millenium does not start
::::until 2001. A
::::> > > millennia is 1000 years, there was no year "0", so 1 AD through
::::> > 1000 AD was
::::> > > the first millennia, 1001 AD through 2000 the second (see
::::a pattern
::::> > > forming?) and the third millennia starts 2001. Just some food for
::::> > > thought...
::::> > >
::::> > > Dan
::::> > >
::::> > >
::::> > > ----- Original Message -----
::::> > > From: "Ernest N. Wilcox Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
::::> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
::::> > > Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2000 07:25
::::> > > Subject: Re: [newbie] New Millenium
::::> > >
::::> > >
::::> > > > On Fri, 31 Dec 1999, Warren Doney wrote:
::::> > > > | 00.32 01/01/00 NZDT
::::> > > > | Happy new Millenium all...
::::> > > > |
::::> > > > | --
::::> > > > | Full plate & packing steel! - Minsk
::::> > > >
::::> > > > I've heard all the arguments about the new millenium not
::::> > starting until
::::> > > > 1/1/2001, but I think we should all compromise, and make the
::::> > entire year
::::> > > of
::::> > > > 2000 a celebration of our miraculous survival for two
::::> > millemia. This way,
::::> > > by
::::> > > > the end of the year, no one will care when the third
::::millemium starts.
::::> > > >
::::> > > > The finest the new millenium has to offer to all,
::::> > > >
::::> > > > Ernie ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
::::> > > >
::::> >
::::>
::::
::::
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:Clark;David
FN:David Clark
ORG:TCSG
TEL;HOME;VOICE:(318) 837-6217
ADR;WORK:;;113 B North St. Pierre;Broussard;LA;70518-3922;United States of America
LABEL;WORK;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:113 B North St. Pierre=0D=0ABroussard, LA 70518-3922=0D=0AUnited States =
of America
ADR;HOME:;;113 North St Pierre;Lafayette;Louisiana;70518-3922;USA
LABEL;HOME;ENCODING=QUOTED-PRINTABLE:113 North St Pierre=0D=0ALafayette, Louisiana 70518-3922=0D=0AUSA
EMAIL;PREF;INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
REV:19991226T184025Z
END:VCARD
