At 09:20 AM 2/9/00 -0500, you wrote:
>nope.
>that's not what i claim.
>however, from my experience and EVERYONE ELSE i know who regularly uses
M$, it is highly
>improbable that any M$ installation could ever be called 'stable',
'reliable' or 'dependable'.
[much deletia]
I agree with you so far! until...
>and this is why, despite the software that they have produced which works,
i cannot stand by
>M$.
??? Non-sequitur! Imperfection...destroy! Destroy! :-)
Seriously: WHAT "software that they have produced which works"? I have
never seen any...
[Much quoted material deleted]
--
.*. "Clouds are not spheres, mountains are not cones, coastlines are not
-() < circles, and bark is not smooth, nor does lightning travel in a
`*' straight line." -------------------------------------------------
-- B. Mandelbrot |http://surf.to/pgd.net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_____________________ ____|________ Paul Derbyshire
Programmer & Humanist|ICQ: 10423848|
