[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > ...and this was a decision that was met with ease by both parties. > > I sense some definite hostility towards Macmillan on this thread. > I'd like to publicly say it is a very successful and positive partnership between >the two companies. > > Thanks, > BG I like the way Macmillian handles L-M.... For as little as $20, books, heavy docs, and support... I believe that it's any commercialism of Linux that they are afraid of... Some people want to be soooo anti-Billy G that they hurt themselves...... Heck, it probably cost me more than that to print up the doc pages..... MarkP
- Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. Alan Shoemaker
- Re: McMillan monopoly [was [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.] Ron Peake
- Re: McMillan monopoly [was [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.... Denis HAVLIK
- Re: McMillan monopoly [was [newbie] ATTN: ALA... Glyn Millington
- Re: McMillan monopoly [was [newbie] ATTN:... Denis HAVLIK
- Re: McMillan monopoly [was [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S.... michael
- Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. michael
- RE: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. Bill . Gardner
- RE: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. Denis HAVLIK
- Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. Alan Shoemaker
- Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. Mark Potochnik
- Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. Alan Shoemaker
- Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. michael
- Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. Mark Potochnik
- Re: [newbie] ATTN: ALAN S. Alan Shoemaker