Denis....agreed.
Alan
Denis HAVLIK wrote:
>
> On 31 May 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> :~>> :~>It will still be confusing to many folks if, like they did
> :~>> :~>with 6.1, MacMillan decides to market 7.1 as 7.5!! Their
> :~>> :~>excuse was that more people will purchase an upgrade sequenced
> :~>> :~>by .5 than would have bought it sequenced if sequenced by only
> :~>> :~>.1. Sheesh!!
> :~>>
> :~>> AFAIK this is not allowed by our new contract. And there will
> :~>> be only one
> :~>> pack in english-speaking countries - from McMillan.
> :~>>
> :~>...and this was a decision that was met with ease by both parties.
> :~>
> :~>I sense some definite hostility towards Macmillan on this thread. I'd like to
>publicly say it is a very successful and positive partnership between the two
>companies.
> :~>
>
> Actually, the bigest problems we had were exactly 6.1 -> 6.5 like
> stuff. Following both packaging schema we used and the one McMillan used
> was a big headache for all (at least for me). And having two products
> from the same company (Mandrakesoft), allmost the same thing inside, but
> sold under two names and by two different companies
> (Mandrakesoft<->MacMillan) is complete nonsence.
>
> New deal sounds much better to me.
>
> cu
> Denis
> --
> -----------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Denis Havlik <http://www.ap.univie.ac.at/users/havlik>
> Mandrakesoft ||| e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Quality Assurance (@ @) (private: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
> -------------------oOO--(_)--OOo---------------------
> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me
> spread! ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
