I don't think ReiserFS is worth crying about since it doesn't get smaller than 32MB...
A partition that small (such as /boot) isn't getting much activity anyhow. So using a non journel FS is fine. Or, like you seggested, ext3. Fsck on <32MB is hardly even noticable. On Sun, 2002-02-10 at 14:23, Lyvim Xaphir wrote: > On Sunday 10 February 2002 16:28, you wrote: > > For a partition so small why on earth would you even use a JFS? If you > > are never going to touch it make it ext2 and mount it ro. > > > > journal a FS that is going to undergo many changes (basically an active > > FS).... when you mess with your kernel (or ar messing with something in > > /boot) just run /bin/sync several times before running lilo. more > > chances lilo screwing up then any fsck running on lilo... > > > > and running fsck on a <32MB drive is very very fast... no need to > > journal... > > Well, running ext3 FS on a <32mb drive is very very fast also, plus you > eliminate the need for fsck. If you've got the ability available, I > personally don't see any reason not to use it. What's the big deal, unless > you just like typing /bin/sync ? > > _________________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com > > > ---- > > Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? > Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com -- Bryan Whitehead SysAdmin - JPL - Interferometry Systems and Technology Phone: 818 354 2903 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
