Hi,there is one serious argument against the patch, that I didn't provide full rfc implementation...but take a look at your syslog nohostname option,
is it rfc3164 compliant? On 06/20/2018 02:45 PM, Maxim Dounin wrote:
Hello! On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 12:25:07AM +0200, Tomas Hulata wrote:thanks for reply. RFC 5424 obsoletes RFC 3164, so what is the reason to follow just old/obsolete one?RFC 3164 and RFC 5424 are different protocols. And RFC 3164 is much more common.
-- S pozdravom Tomas Hulata /vedoucí úseku systemových inženýrů/ tel: +420 733 163 238 NETBOX SMART Comp. a.s., Kubíčkova 8, 635 00, Brno Tel./fax: +420 544 423 411, www.netbox.cz
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ nginx-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-devel
