I don't want to re-run the debate about Nikon reps. However, while discussing the pros
and
cons of various lens combinations, the Nikon representative here (for a mini photo
show) was
adamant that the quality of the Nikkor 20-35 f2.8 zoom was equivalent to the relevant
primes, e.g., 20mm f2.8 and 24 mm f2.8.
Has anyone who has first hand experience of both these primes and the 20-35 zoom? Is
the
rep. correct or is he just spinning a story to try to get me to shell out over
NZD$3000?
All comments would be appreciated.
Regards
Mike Freeman
Christchurch
New Zealand
