The Nikon AF20-35mm f/2.8 is a superb optic and is in most ways as good as the fixed Nikons that is "replaces". However being a zoom it still is more flair prone and does not focus as closely as a fixed lens. Yes, this is mainly a lens for sports and Photojournalism. I tried it out when it first came out and found it excellent, but I didn't get one because I regularly focus closer than it's limit of 2 feet and prefer a smaller, less obvious lens to work with. The flair question did enter my mind as well as I often work in situations that can cause flair. I do 90% of my general assignment work with 2 N90s bodies, one with a 24mm f/2.8 and another with an 85mm f/1.8 and a 50mm f/1.4 in a waist bag. Small differences in position from the subject is all that is required when working close to the subject, as I do. Many editors have commented upon reviewing my film, on my "good use of different lenses" when I was only using those 3 fixed lenses. One day I will get a 20-35mm zoom as a great back-up and for odd situations, like aerial photography, but I don't miss having one in my daily arsenal. Jonathan Castner Photojournalist Denver
