[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Chris Somers) wrote: > On the plus side, it was a beautiful *sounding* camera :) Though > I couldn't hear a difference between "C" and "CS" on the film advance, > but I presume that's because there was no film in the camera. It > is noticeably quieter than the N90; but subjectively (from memory) > I think the EOS A2 is still quieter. I have heard the Canon A2 is quiet mainly because it uses belts rather than gear to gear connection in its motor drive. That doesn't sound like something Nikon would put into a high end camera though I can't think of a mechanical reason why it would be a compromise. I know belts do break or stretch but that should be cheap to fix. David Johnson
