> I read the latest copy of the UK magazine Photo Technique, which had a > comparison between the Dynax 9, EOS 3 and F100 based on test shots. > > Their preference: > 1. Dynax 9 > 2. F100 > 3. EOS 3 > > with the EOS 3 coming up last mainly because of underexposure problems. Actually, in Chasseur d' Images, they rated F100 first, Canon second and Dynax last for what metering concerns: F100: very consistent exposure system, a la F5. Tuned towards a slight over-exposure (0.3 stop). EOS3: very good system, but not as consistent in very tricky cases. Slight under-exposure bias (0.3 stop) Dynax: very good system, with good detection of off-center subjects (thanks to the honeycomb pattern), but sometimes inconsistent results, due to funny reactions in some cases. Did you say "fuzzy logic"? ;-) I guess it all depends on the kind of test pictures, and the bias of the journalists... Nicolas.
