Do people out the really think AF-S is necessary in the 20-35 range? I
don't own this lens (yet), but I did try it at a store recently, and thought
the AF speed was great. Would the AF-S really be needed here, or would it
just jack the price up to $2K+? Just wondering what the opinions are?
--Mark
>So Nikon is finally adding more AF-S lenses to its lineup. In particular,
>the 28-70mm/f2.8 AF-S signals that they are venturing into wide-angle
>AF-S lenses. What do people think the next ones will be?
>I am considering getting the 20-35mm/f2.8 D AF-S, but that lens is
>already 6 years old. Nikon now has several long AF-S lenses,
>followed by the 80-200 zoom and then the 28-70 zoom. The 20-35/2.8
>(or 17-35mm/f2.8) logically seems to be the next one to be upgraded.
