Hi,
can you draw youre setup. I used 2.6.23 and the next setup which
works fine.
----------- ------------------------------- -----------
|172.16.77.1|---|172.16.77.2 nistnet 172.16.76.2|---------|172.16.76.1|
----------- ------------------------------- -----------
You also need to check if there are interrupts commong on irq 8, in "cat
/proc/interrupts". These are are needed by nistnet to get the delay
working. If you use drop does that work ?
regards,
Ernst
João Gabriel G. Granado Rodrigues wrote:
> Well, just updating things...
>
> these are my outputs:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] nistnet-3.0a]# cnistnet -R
> cnistnet -a poseidon.laas.fr <http://poseidon.laas.fr> telemaque.laas.fr
> <http://telemaque.laas.fr> --delay 10.000
> cnistnet -a telemaque.laas.fr <http://telemaque.laas.fr>
> poseidon.laas.fr <http://poseidon.laas.fr> --delay 10.000
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] nistnet-3.0a]# cnistnet -G
> Emulator is: On
> Average processed packet overhead 6 usec
> Average unprocessed packet overhead 3 usec
> Average hash tries 0
>
>
> Well, i've tried a few sugestions and when I do (i removed the others
> rules):
>
> cnistnet -a *MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:*
> 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0> *MailScanner warning: numerical links are often
> malicious:* 0.0.0.0 <http://0.0.0.0> --delay 10
>
> my network stops working. I believe this is sign nistnet works (maybe
> not as it should)
>
> then when I switch to this rule:
>
> cnistnet -a *MailScanner warning: numerical links are often malicious:*
> 0.0.0.0:0 <http://0.0.0.0:0>.icmp *MailScanner warning: numerical links
> are often malicious:* 0.0.0.0:0 <http://0.0.0.0:0>.icmp --delay 1
>
> my network works fine, but if i try to ping, this is what i get:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ ping telemaque
> PING telemaque.laas.fr <http://telemaque.laas.fr> (*MailScanner warning:
> numerical links are often malicious:* 140.93.2.191
> <http://140.93.2.191>) 56(84) bytes of data.
>
> --- telemaque.laas.fr <http://telemaque.laas.fr> ping statistics ---
> 14 packets transmitted, 0 received, 100% packet loss, time 12999ms
>
> No packets at all!
>
> any idea?
>
> gabriel
> On 10/23/07, *João Gabriel G. Granado Rodrigues *
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Hello there!
>
> After a few days of a lot of tries, i finally succeeded to compile
> NistNet on Fedora Core 7, using kernel 2.6.22.9-91.
>
> Now, I am trying to use it. From what I've read in the Internet,
> including this mail list, I'd better use NistNet in a linux box
> configured as router. And also, have two more boxes attached to it.
> (Is this right?)
> Well... I've talked to my boss to get this hardware set up, but
> until there, I got one question:
>
> I running nistnet in a machine with a single NIC. I've tried to add
> rules for delay like:
>
> cnistnet -a telemaque poseidon --delay 10
> cnistnet -a poseidon telemaque --delay 10
>
> Where telemaque is my machine and poseidon is another machine in the
> LAN.
> Nistnet is running and up, and the rules are implemented without errors.
>
> But, when I try to ping one machine from another, nistnet has no
> effect at all on then.
> Should't nistnet delay the packets coming from poseidon to my
> machine (telemaque)? What am I missing?
>
> Thank you!!
>
> Gabriel
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and is believed to be clean.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> nistnet mailing list
> nistnet@antd.nist.gov
> http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nistnet
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and is believed to be clean
_______________________________________________
nistnet mailing list
nistnet@antd.nist.gov
http://www-x.antd.nist.gov/mailman/listinfo/nistnet
