Hi Paul, > > so `-nopri' would be needed to be unambiguous if it were to become > > the common option across nmh commands. That's tedious, and doesn't > > obviously say `be quiet', ending in an `eye' sound, not an `ee', so > > the `...nt' would be added anyway. > > you kind of lost me in that last bit, but i'll take your word for it. > ;-)
I mean, I'd read `pri' as sounding like the start of priority, not print. > but i don't think i'll hold up actually implementing -noprint, for the > folder command, on the development branch. Sure, I'm not an arbiter, just opinionated so did some research. :-) -- Cheers, Ralph. https://plus.google.com/+RalphCorderoy -- Nmh-workers https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
