On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 6:37 PM, Aditya Mahajan <adit...@umich.edu> wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:11 PM, Mikael Persson wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Mojca Miklavec >>> <mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:54 PM, Mikael Persson wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Mojca, does it work both in mkii and mkiv for you? >>>> >>>> I only tested in mkii so far (I suspect that mkiv suffers from the >>>> lack of Utopia in proper format, so one would need to check >>>> typescripts). >>>> >>>> Mojca >>> >>> Thank you Mojca for your help! >>> >>> I'm also being a bit curious about the [tf] in >>> >>> \definemathsymbol [hat] [accent] [tf] ["2] >>> >>> In math-fou.tex I see >>> mi (Math Italics?) >>> sy (Symbols?) >>> ex (Extension?) >>> mr (Math Roman?) >>> >>> 2) I guess all [mr] (10 or so) in math-fou.tex safely can be changed to >>> [tf]? >> >> I would not just bet on it. I would try it first. If mr works, one >> should better leave mr, but I have no idea why it fails. > > The reason \hat is defined using tf is because the math font does not have > accents. This is the same thing with Euler, and last I checked (about a > months ago), Euler accents work perfectly in MKIV. So, in principle it > should work with Fourier also. > > I do not have time right now to look into it, maybe sometime next week. > >>> 3) Does anyone know what has to be done to get this working in mkiv? >> >> Hans, what's the strategy with non-unicode fonts, in particular >> Utopia? It doesn't come in otf format, but could still be used in both >> mkiv and XeTeX. Is there some type-something.tex foreseen for such >> fonts? > > Another possibility is to redistribute the fonts as otf. From what I > understand from the license (http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/utopia/) > it is ok to modify the fonts (ie change the format) as long as you do not > call the modified font utopia, and remove all references to Adobe. Are there > tools to convert type 1 to otf? > > Aditya
Thanks Mojca and Aditya for your help. I just found out that if I change \definefontsynonym [MathRoman] [Utopia-Regular] to \definefontsynonym [MathRoman] [futr8t] in the typescript file, and define the math accents as: \def\grave{\mathaccent"7000} \def\acute{\mathaccent"7001} \def\hat{\mathaccent"7002} \def\tilde{\mathaccent"7003} \def\ddot{\mathaccent"7004} \def\mathring{\mathaccent"7006} \def\check{\mathaccent"7007} \def\breve{\mathaccent"7008} \def\bar{\mathaccent"7009} \def\dot{\mathaccent"700A} they all work (both in mkii and mkiv). Can someone explain how to convert these definitions to context versions, for example like \definemathsymbol [acute] [accent] [tf] ["1]? Best regards, Mikael ___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://tex.aanhet.net archive : https://foundry.supelec.fr/projects/contextrev/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________