Hi Hans, Thanks for your attention which fixed most of the difficulties with vertical distances around math formulas. However, after typesetting a long document, I noticed that there are still some incorrect behaviours. The following minimal example, extracted from that long document, shows what is wrong: please have a look at the second formula in the attached PDF. (The output with the older version from TeXLIve 2016 is correct).
%% begin vertical-space-bug.tex
\starttext
\input knuth.tex
\startformula
a \leq a_{n+1} \leq a_{n} \leq b_{n+1} \leq b_{n} \leq b, \qquad\mbox{et}\qquad
0 \leq b_{n} - a_{n} \leq 2^{-n}(b_{0} - a_{0}).
\stopformula
\input ward.tex
\startformula
g(x_{*}) = \lim_{n\to\infty} g(a_{n}) \leq 0 \leq \lim_{n\to\infty} g(b_{n}) =
g(x_{*}),
\stopformula
\input knuth.tex
\stoptext
%% end vertical-space-bug.tex
vertical-space-bug-2017-01-17.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
> On 18 Jan 2017, at 19:15, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: > > On 1/18/2017 6:23 PM, Nicola wrote: >> On 18/01/2017 17:53, Otared Kavian wrote: >>> Hi Nicola, >>> >>> In fact, if you are in a hurry and don’t use subtle things >>> introduced since May 2016, you can use the stable version of ConTeXt >>> from TeXLive >>> 2016 (the bug noticed by Mikael, and you, is absent from that version >>> of ConTeXt). >> >> Thanks, that's what I am doing now. Strangely enough, it fixes the >> layout for all the slides, *except* the one I have posted before. But >> that one I can easily fix. > > the current (yesterdays) beta should be ok .. (the midpar flushing of a > formula) > > a while ago i reimplemented spacing around display math and as a side effect > there might be slightly different spacing (in which case probably the old > situation was wrong > > it relates to the fact that tex (traditionally) has some assumptions and does > some spacing that interferes with the way we want to control spacing (e.g. it > always forces baselineskips while we don't always want them) and it was close > to impossible to identify such cases robustly > > (think of preceding lines with different depths) > > recent luatex has ways to disable that so i could finally come up with > cleaner spacing models for display math > > so, apart from bugs the current model is the one that will stay (or course > more control can be added) > > Hans > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE > Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands > tel: 038 477 53 69 | www.pragma-ade.nl | www.pragma-pod.nl > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > ___________________________________________________________________________________ > If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the > Wiki! > > maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context > webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net > archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ > wiki : http://contextgarden.net > ___________________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webpage : http://www.pragma-ade.nl / http://context.aanhet.net archive : https://bitbucket.org/phg/context-mirror/commits/ wiki : http://contextgarden.net ___________________________________________________________________________________
