And if I use the DNA drivers, then I guess NAPI is not involved, right?
does it solve the problem?

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Behrooz Shafiee <[email protected]> wrote:

> Oh, I see. So I guess there is no way to stop NAPI thread from doing so? I
> mean can't NAPI first check the ring then read from NIC?
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> The NAPI thread is fast enough dequeueing from the NIC, but then it find
>> the ring full and discards the packets (drops).
>>
>> Alfredo
>>
>>
>> On 06 Nov 2014, at 23:25, Behrooz Shafiee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alfredo,
>>
>>  I got your point but I don't understand the point of flow-control then!
>> If I'm slow then pfring should slow down reading from NIC so NIC will
>> notice the slowdown and sends a pause frame to the sender! Is there
>> anything wrong with this logic?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Alfredo Cardigliano <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Behrooz
>>> your application is not fast enough dequeueing packets from the ring,
>>> thus the drops.
>>> You should try increasing the ring size (via insmod parameter), it helps
>>> at least with spikes.
>>>
>>> Alfredo
>>>
>>> On 06 Nov 2014, at 23:01, Behrooz Shafiee <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Pavel,
>>>
>>>  I'm not sure what do you mean but here is the output of to during run:
>>>
>>> top - 16:58:48 up  2:27,  8 users,  load average: 0.25, 0.59, 0.81
>>> Tasks: 211 total,   4 running, 207 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
>>> %Cpu(s):  7.3 us,  7.1 sy,  0.0 ni, 84.6 id,  0.2 wa,  0.8 hi,  0.0 si,
>>> 0.0 st
>>> KiB Mem:  16334304 total,  5330972 used, 11003332 free,   112164 buffers
>>> KiB Swap: 10207228 total,        0 used, 10207228 free.  2101892 cached
>>> Mem
>>>
>>> I just realized that if I use pfring_stats  when I receive the whole
>>> 5000 packet the number of drops is 0 and when I don't receive all of them
>>> the number of drops in the stats is around 2000-3000.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Pavel Odintsov <[email protected]
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> Could you show top header and htop output?
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 12:48 AM, Behrooz Shafiee <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Hi everyone,
>>>> >
>>>> >  I have implemented a small transmission protocol over pfring. I rely
>>>> on the
>>>> > Ethernet flow control meaning that I assume that in the same subnet I
>>>> won't
>>>> > loose any packet (I've no router so no queueing...). Everything was
>>>> fine
>>>> > until I did some stress test as follows.
>>>> > I have a rcvThread which block on pfring_recv() function for each one
>>>> > incoming packet and process it. I start a huge number of other
>>>> threads(e.g
>>>> > 5000) and each of them send a req to server through pfring_send (resp
>>>> is one
>>>> > packet). And then server replies with 5000 packet. most of the time i
>>>> > receive the 5000 packets but sometimes I miss some of them. For
>>>> example I
>>>> > reach the line after pfring_recv() 4503 times. I thought this is due
>>>> to
>>>> > overflow in the NIC but I use intel pro which has both rx/tx flow
>>>> pause
>>>> > frame on and I actually used a packet dump tool (such as wireshark)
>>>> and I
>>>> > see the packets are being received by the NIC. So I assume they get
>>>> lost
>>>> > somewhere a long the line from NIC to pfring_recv() function. Can
>>>> anyone
>>>> > help me what might have gone wrong?
>>>> >
>>>> > PS. I use pfring in normal mode not DNA
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks,
>>>> > --
>>>> > Behrooz
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > Ntop-misc mailing list
>>>> > [email protected]
>>>> > http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sincerely yours, Pavel Odintsov
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Behrooz
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Behrooz
>>  _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ntop-misc mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Behrooz
>



-- 
Behrooz
_______________________________________________
Ntop-misc mailing list
[email protected]
http://listgateway.unipi.it/mailman/listinfo/ntop-misc

Reply via email to