On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 9:52 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com > > wrote: > >> >> >> On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: >> >>> Fri, 28 May 2010 12:13:57 -0500, Travis Oliphant wrote: >>> [clip] >>> > I think this makes sense so that we can reschedule NumPy 2.0 for >>> > September and still provide a release with the Python 3k changes (I am >>> > assuming these can be done in an ABI-compatible way). >>> >>> As far as I remember, the Py3 changes did not require breaking ABI (on >>> Py2). >>> >>> Good. How much work is it to remove datetime, and who wants to do it? >> >> > Hey, I thought that was your job ;) Maybe the best thing is to start by > making a branch for the removal and we can argue about who gets the short > end of the stick later... > > Manage the release yes, do the heavy lifting not necessarily:) OK, I'll make the branch tonight. If the removal just involves the same changes that were made for 1.4.1 then I can do it. But I'm not familiar with this code and if it's more work, I probably won't have time for it between the scipy 0.8.0 release and my 'real job', like you call it. Cheers, Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
