On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Ralf Gommers <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Charles R Harris < > charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Pauli Virtanen <p...@iki.fi> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Should we set a date for a bugfix 1.5.1 release? There are some bugs that >>> would be nice to sort out in the 1.5.x series: >>> >>> Any Python versions: >>> >>> - #1605 (Cython vs. PEP-3118 issue: raising exceptions with active >>> cython buffers caused undefined behavior. Breaks Sage.) >>> - #1617 (Ensure complex(np.longcomplex(...)) doesn't drop the imag part) >>> - Fix doc build >>> >>> Python 3 specific: >>> >>> - #1604 (//-issue in distutils; infinite loop in some cases :) >>> - #1609 (dotblas was never used on Python 3) >>> - #1610 (fromfile/tofile did not stay in sync with Python 3 file handle >>> position -- breaks e.g. scipy.io pretty badly) >>> - f2py startup script didn't run properly on Py3 >>> >>> Not so many fixes so far, but I'd like to see a Numpy release with #1610 >>> fixed before releasing Scipy with Python 3 support. Since 2.0.0 breaks >>> binary compatibility and merging the refactoring back may take some time, >>> it would be nice to have another 1.5.x release. >>> >>> Ralf & c, opinions? I'd maybe suggest somewhere on the Oct/Nov axis. >>> >>> >> A 1.5.1 release soon would be good. All the issues above are already > committed, is there anything else that needs to go in? If not, I think an RC > by the end of next week (10/17) and release by the end of the month should > be possible. > > The one bug that I want to have fixed is #1399, which causes build problems > for scipy on OS X. > > Sounds good. I also have some stuff I'd like to add but won't have much >> time before Nov. But whatever looks good to Ralf will work for me. >> > > Any specific issues you have in mind? > > No, I just wanted to include the Laguerre and Hermite polynomials and add a domain keyword to the linspace method of the polynomial template. But I don't think these are pressing needs. Chuck
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
