On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Charles R Harris <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 10:12 AM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:11 AM, Charles R Harris >> <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Ralf Gommers >> > <ralf.gomm...@googlemail.com> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Pierre GM <pgmdevl...@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Just asking, >> >>> Should I backport some bugs that were corrected in 2.0 for numpy.ma ? >> >>> I >> >>> don't have any particular in mind, but I'm sure there must be some... >> >>> >> >> That would be helpful. Please backport any bug fixes that you think are >> >> important. >> >> >> > >> > IIRC, there was also a fix that Josef wanted in one of the stats >> > functions >> > before 1.5 but I don't remember which. Josef? >> >> Not sure, The only things that I remember right now is that Alan >> wanted to have ddof instead of bias in cov for consistency in names >> across functions, and the usual >> >> >>> np.nansum([]) >> 1.#QNAN >> >>> np.nansum([np.nan]) >> 1.#QNAN >> >> Both will change current behavior and might need a depreciation cycle. >> >> I have to see if a search through the mailing list turns something up. >> > > I think it was something about Pareto...
Ok I remember, Pareto is actually Lomax or Pareto second kind, and should be renamed. The proposal was to rename the current pareto to pareto2 and create a new pareto that corrects location by one. In the meantime I discovered that Lomax is actually nicer to work with than Pareto one, so it's mainly a question of terminology/names and documentation. Just calling it pareto is very misleading. Josef > > Chuck > > > _______________________________________________ > NumPy-Discussion mailing list > NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org > http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion > > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion