On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 12:03 AM, <josef.p...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:42 PM, Charles R Harris > <charlesr.har...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Derek Homeier >> <de...@astro.physik.uni-goettingen.de> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On 4 Apr 2011, at 22:04, Ralf Gommers wrote: >>> >>> > I am pleased to announce the availability of the second beta of NumPy >>> > 1.6.0. Due to the extensive changes in the Numpy core for this >>> > release, the beta testing phase will last at least one month. Please >>> > test this beta and report any problems on the Numpy mailing list. >>> > >>> the tests have a number of Python2.4-incompatibilities, one for a file >>> opening mode and the rest for class declaration styles. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Derek >>> >>> Running unit tests for numpy >>> NumPy version 1.6.0b2 >>> NumPy is installed in /sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy >>> Python version 2.4.4 (#1, Jan 5 2011, 03:05:41) [GCC 4.0.1 (Apple >>> Inc. build 5493)] >>> nose version 1.0.0 >>> ..... >>> ====================================================================== >>> ERROR: Failure: SyntaxError (invalid syntax (test_multiarray.py, line >>> 1023)) >>> ... >>> File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/core/tests/ >>> test_multiarray.py", line 1023 >>> class TestPutmask(): >>> ^ >>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax >>> >>> ====================================================================== >>> ERROR: Failure: SyntaxError (invalid syntax (test_numeric.py, line >>> 1068)) >>> ... >>> File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/core/tests/ >>> test_numeric.py", line 1068 >>> class TestAllclose(): >>> ^ >>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax >>> >>> ====================================================================== >>> ERROR: Failure: SyntaxError (invalid syntax (test_scalarmath.py, line >>> 84)) >>> ... >>> File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/core/tests/ >>> test_scalarmath.py", line 84 >>> class TestRepr(): >>> ^ >>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax >>> >>> ====================================================================== >>> ERROR: Failure: SyntaxError (invalid syntax (test_twodim_base.py, line >>> 280)) >>> ... >>> File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/tests/ >>> test_twodim_base.py", line 280 >>> class TestTriuIndices(): >>> ^ >>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax >>> >>> ====================================================================== >>> ERROR: Failure: SyntaxError (invalid syntax (test_linalg.py, line 243)) >>> ... >>> File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/linalg/tests/ >>> test_linalg.py", line 243 >>> class TestMatrixPower(): >>> ^ >>> SyntaxError: invalid syntax >>> >> >> Subclassing object should fix those, I think. >> >>> >>> ====================================================================== >>> ERROR: test_gft_filename (test_io.TestFromTxt) >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Traceback (most recent call last): >>> File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/tests/test_io.py", >>> line 1327, in test_gft_filename >>> assert_array_equal(np.genfromtxt(name), exp_res) >>> File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/npyio.py", line >>> 1235, in genfromtxt >>> fhd = iter(np.lib._datasource.open(fname, 'Ub')) >>> File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py", >>> line 145, in open >>> return ds.open(path, mode) >>> File "/sw/lib/python2.4/site-packages/numpy/lib/_datasource.py", >>> line 477, in open >>> return _file_openers[ext](found, mode=mode) >>> IOError: invalid mode: Ub >>> >> >> Guess that wasn't tested before ;) I thought that was strange when I saw it. >> The source of the problem is line 2035 in npyio.py. Additionally, Since >> genloadtxt needs to have byte strings the 'rb" mode should probably be used. >> That works on linux, both for python 2 and python 3, but doing that might >> uncover genfromtxt problems on other platforms. > > "rb" is fine on Windows with python 3.2, (that's what I tested > initially for this bug)
Sorry, I take this back. All our files have \n file endings not \r\n. So I didn't test the latter case. Josef > > Josef > >> >> Chuck >> _______________________________________________ >> NumPy-Discussion mailing list >> NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org >> http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion >> >> > _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
