Hi Ralf, Ralf Gommers, on 2013-04-06 10:51, wrote: > P.P.S. expect an identical response from me to future proposals that > include backwards compatibility breaks of heavily used functions for > something that's not a functional enhancement or bug fix. Such proposals > are just not OK.
but it is a functional enhancement or bug fix - the ambiguity in the affect of order= values in several places only serve to confuse two different ideas into one. -- Paul Ivanov 314 address only used for lists, off-list direct email at: http://pirsquared.org | GPG/PGP key id: 0x0F3E28F7 _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
