On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Paul Ivanov <pivanov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Ralf, > > Ralf Gommers, on 2013-04-06 10:51, wrote: > > P.P.S. expect an identical response from me to future proposals that > > include backwards compatibility breaks of heavily used functions for > > something that's not a functional enhancement or bug fix. Such proposals > > are just not OK. > > but it is a functional enhancement or bug fix - the ambiguity in > the affect of order= values in several places only serve to > confuse two different ideas into one. That sentence makes zero sense. The reason you can't decide whether it's a bug fix or enhancement is because it's neither. What ambiguity there is can be solved with documentation only, there's nothing new you can do with these functions after introducing a new keyword and there is no bug. Ralf
_______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion
