On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Joseph McGlinchy <jmcglin...@esri.com> wrote:
> Upon further investigation, I do believe it is within the scipy code where
> there is a leak. I commented out my call to processBinaryImage(), which is
> all scipy code calls, and my memory usage remains flat with approximately a
> 1MB variation. Any ideas?

I'd suggest continuing along this line, and keep chopping things out
until you have a minimal program that still shows the problem --
that'll probably make it much clearer where the problem is actually
coming from...

-n
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
http://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion

Reply via email to