Hi, On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 1:36 PM, Fernando Perez <fperez....@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> I see a severe reaction to perceived 'suspicion and innuendo', but I >> see no 'suspicion and innuendo'. Unless you mean that any suggestion >> of potential conflict of interest is suspicion and innuendo. > > > No, as I said, COIs are absolutely a fact of life, and *should* be talked > about, openly and directly. I was referring generically about the tone of > this thread, that Ryan described as "bizarre", others as "surpised", > "disheartened", etc.
Sure, I said above, it is clearly true the some people reacted very strongly. Did you see any remark made by me or Stefan or anyone else that could reasonably be described as bizarre, surprising or disheartening? Cheers, Matthew _______________________________________________ NumPy-Discussion mailing list NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org https://mail.scipy.org/mailman/listinfo/numpy-discussion