More information from the heap dump Dominator tree:

org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.SessionStats  1,209,422 objects,
used heap: 58,052,255 retained heap: 2,906,002,584

This seems like a likely culprit.  Is this an indication that I am not
closing sessions as thoroughly as I thought, or is SessionStats held by
some other object? 

Jim Tully 





On 10/16/15, 9:12 PM, "Jim.Tully" <[email protected]> wrote:

>Torgeir,
>
>No, the webapp runs constantly, until we finally run out of memory and are
>forced to restart.  We¹re currently running version 1.2.2, if that
>matters.  
>
>
>Jim Tully
>
>
>On 10/16/15, 9:07 PM, "Torgeir Veimo" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>Does your webapp restart during this time?
>>
>>On 17 October 2015 at 03:14, Jim.Tully <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> This is probably something that we are doing incorrectly, but it has me
>>>scratching my head.
>>>
>>> We are running Oak embedded in a web application.  We construct a
>>>repository at startup using fairly standard construction:
>>>
>>>
>>> DocumentNodeStore ns= new
>>>DocumentMK.Builder().setMongoDB(createMongoDB()).getNodeStore();
>>>
>>>
>>> Oak oak = new Oak(ns);
>>>
>>>
>>> LuceneIndexProvider provider = new LuceneIndexProvider();
>>>
>>> Jcr jcr = new Jcr(oak).with((QueryIndexProvider)
>>>provider).with((Observer) provider)
>>>
>>> .with(new LuceneIndexEditorProvider()).withAsyncIndexing();
>>>
>>> repository = jcr.createRepository();
>>>
>>> Looking at the JVM memory using JVisualVM, we see that memory usage
>>>increases over time.  Using heap dumps, we've determined that oak object
>>>is constantly growing in terms of  memory footprint.
>>>
>>> Obviously the object will never be garbage collected, but I'm trying to
>>>track down why it is growing over time.  Our interactions with Oak all
>>>follow the same pattern:
>>> Session session = repository.login(credentials, null);
>>> ... do some work
>>> session.logout();
>>>
>>> Any thoughts on possible reasons for Oak to keep increasing in size?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Jim
>>
>>
>>
>>-- 
>>-Tor
>

Reply via email to