Matthew Sprange said, "we do not primarily target gamers who are specifically looking for OGC material [...] We never intended it to be pulled apart and used elsewhere"
Not to be contrary, but isn't the whole intent of the OGL that you _must_ explicitly intend and structure your materials to be pulled apart and used elsewhere. It seems clear to me that the spirit and the wording of the license make it pretty clear that if you publish under its rules, then you are saying that you are going to target both comsumers (with your content) AND your publishing peers (with your structure). That's why it says OGC should be 'clearly marked' and not just 'available upon request'. There can be little doubt here that your peers don't seem to think you are clearly marking your OGC as you ought to according to their interpretation of the license. Mind you, their interpretation doesn't amount to much legally (only a judge's and, arguably, WotC's do) but if enough kids don't like what you're doing in the sandbox and complain to the teacher.... Just to be clear, I haven't reviewed your material in question of the full fact enough to have a strong opinion yet. The above is more a commentary of your post and the posts of your peers on this list. -Tom Caudron _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
