> So...you're saying that you purposely make it as hard as possible to figure > out what's OGC (making it the reader's responsibility), because you don't > intend for others to re-use OGC from your books?
My priority is for the average gamer. For example, we could (as we are doing in the Game Designer's Companion) list a seperate section 15 entry by each new rule (feat, in this case). Now, this works very well with a book that has component rules systems stretching over several pages. It is less appealing to do this with over 1,000 feats. In fact, it would look downright ugly. So we opted for the current route, primarily for the clarity of the vast majority of gamers who will actually end up using this book. _That_ is what I am saying. Matthew _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
